|
Well, when you take way all of the rhetoric, it basically comes down to a single question: "Should this group or any group of citizens be afforded equal rights under the law?"
As long as the group in question is law-abiding, then the answer is obviously "yes", it can't be anything but "yes", and it should always be "yes".
I don't believe that the matter can be addressed more simply than this, and it doesn't depend upon whether or not one approves of homosexuality to reach this conclusion when this approach is used.
"Mind your wants, 'cause someone wants your mind." -George Clinton
|