Right. I don't think that porn is necessarily a good thing. My main contention was that, as I said in my first post, if porn in general is deemed acceptable (including whatever is needed to make it), then it would not make sense to establish a particular ban on this type of small-breast porn without some concrete reasons to back such a ban up. We would have already discarded the moral issue of allowing people to have sex on camera and other general problems with porn.
I just don't think it is acceptable for a governing body to act on what they feel is "sensible" when they are perfectly capable of finding out the truth of the matter. And really, if they don't, I'd say they are failing in their duty to the citizens they supposedly represent. No responsible person should make laws that impact others based on their gut feelings.
"Words are deeds." - Wittgenstein