So, THIS is not Relevant to THAT... (read first post)

[Darth Avlectus]

Pretty simple really. You answer the word in the post above you with "is not relevant to" and then answer it with something else. Then either you use that word or a different relevant word relevant to your answer and... it starts all over again as someone else answers you and repeats the process...

Can be a single word or a subject, noun, verb...be creative but don't overdo it.

If the post above you screws up, you may merely point it out or make light of it... or simply quote them and give them one of these:


I would encourage you to say "Fail, GTFO." except I'm afraid you might get infracted and I will get infracted for every time you do it thereafter. Oh wai...

On occasion you can quote someone else and make a wisecrack or whatever.

EDIT: I guess it begs an example....

Person 1:

"Dumpster diving" (quotations not necessary)
===========
Person 2:

Dumpster diving is not relevant to headbanging.
(inclusion of previous post's term not necessary)

Then you go on to restate your term or something relevant to your term.
I.E. this case headbanging, or similarly mosh pitting or maybe crowd whirlpools.

"Mosh pitting"
============
PErson 3:
is not relevant to KOTOR MODDING.

KOTOR MODDING
(and so-on and so-forth)
====================

I'll Begin:

Fried Chicken

[Totenkopf]

"is not relevant to"

Quantum Theory

[Te Darasuum Mandalor]

Is rather relevent too.

Joan of Arc

[Hallucination]

is not relevant to...

French history

Am I doin' it right?

[Totenkopf]

Ok, GTA is being a bit of a nazi here about form. Taking Hal above as an example:

Apparently we're supposed to provide two answers. After Hal took his wry potshot at DM, Hal also should have then put up a new word related to his own answer for someone else to attack or follow through on in the next post. So, GTA, I guess you want something like this:

[Hal] French history[/hal] should have added, say [Hal] Napolean[/Hal]

[me]is not relevant to military strategy[/me]
tactics....

If this ain't what you're looking for GTA, I await Beavis's efforts not to embarras himself....

[Darth Avlectus]

RE-READ FIRST POST!!!
I'll start this over again, please follow form below:

Italian food is not relevant to dirtbiking.

Dirtbike repair...

[Alkonium]

is not relevant to crowbar dueling.

[Totenkopf]

I did and it's what caused all of us to go off the rails. **

Dirtbike repair...is not relevant to polygamy.

Bigamy....

**See, even Alk went off the rails. (Had it been Hal, I'dve figured it was just on purpose. )

[Darth Avlectus]

Bigamy... is not relevant to celibacy.

================

Originally Posted by Alkonium

is not relevant to crowbar dueling.

AND?
.
..
...
Where's your term repeat, or its relevant variation?


Hint: Forgetting this second part here is just like missing a picture in one of the pic threads, or a wish in the ruin a wish thread, etc. Now onward...
=================

Celibacy...

[Hallucination]

Celibacy is not relevant to...
Saturday night

The weekend...

On the topic of the rules, mayhaps it would be easier to just say that if you don't repeat or add a new term to play with that it's implied that the term you used is meant to be countered. So, for example, in Alkonium's last post the 'crowbar dueling' would be used by the next poster.

[Darth Avlectus]

(@Hal, ok. Though I think we've got it now. )

The weekend is not relevant to hemorrhoids.

Hemorrhoids...