lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 08-14-2013, 05:47 PM   #1
machievelli
Local curmudgeon
 
machievelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 2,834
Current Game: Dungeonseige series
Hot Topic Starter Veteran Fan Fic Author Helpful! Forum Veteran 
Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter

This is only the second movie I have lambasted, but give me a break! The entire use of slavery in the South just because Vampires run the South? Give me an effing Break!

The War Between the States (What most of you remember from American History as the Civil War) was fought not over slavery, it was because the Northern merchants that dealt with finished cloth did not want to have competitors in the south who would also be making it. They wanted a subservient South delivering the cotton necessary to their business. When the South first tried to buy such machinery, the North blocked it's importation. At the same time they attacked the South on two fronts; first by banning further importation of slaves (A hot button Liberal issue) and then placing punitive tariffs for any sale of cotton to any port not in the North.

The North did everything to start that war but fire the first shot! Blockading Southern Ports, landing troops to seize cotton on the docks, what people anywherehad faced such acts by their own government without revolting?

The only problem for us was that the South fought too well. It took four years to force them to accept Federal Authority.


'To argue with those who have renounced the use and authority of reason is as futile as to administer medicine to the dead.' Now who said that?

From the one who brought you;
What we die for...
Acceptance
KOTOR excerpts
Star Wars: The Beginning
Star Wars: Republic Dawn
Return From Exile

Last edited by machievelli; 08-14-2013 at 06:05 PM.
machievelli is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-15-2013, 02:21 PM   #2
Darth Avlectus
If Sunday you're free...
 
Darth Avlectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Why don't you come with me...
Posts: 4,267
Current Game: Poisoning pigeons in the park.
This is why I do not watch movies nearly as much as I used to. The producers and the brand labels seem to be warring for the minds, hearts, and souls of people with the use of framing and perception. It's the lamestream, err mainstream media.

Of course the last Lincoln movie was historically inaccurate, too.

I watched Django and as much as the (noted same far left) critics complained of bigotry and racism, they seemed to miss the obvious that it was as much about this as it was these kind of lowlifes being blown to hell. Gruesomely I might add.


We'll murder them all, amid laughter and merriment...except for the few we take home to experiment!

"I cant see S***! --YOU GO TO HELL!" --Tourettes guy
Darth Avlectus is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-15-2013, 08:03 PM   #3
Zerimar Nyliram
Senior Member
 
Zerimar Nyliram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Posts: 1,449
Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by machievelli View Post
This is only the second movie I have lambasted, but give me a break! The entire use of slavery in the South just because Vampires run the South? Give me an effing Break!

The War Between the States (What most of you remember from American History as the Civil War) was fought not over slavery, it was because the Northern merchants that dealt with finished cloth did not want to have competitors in the south who would also be making it. They wanted a subservient South delivering the cotton necessary to their business. When the South first tried to buy such machinery, the North blocked it's importation. At the same time they attacked the South on two fronts; first by banning further importation of slaves (A hot button Liberal issue) and then placing punitive tariffs for any sale of cotton to any port not in the North.

The North did everything to start that war but fire the first shot! Blockading Southern Ports, landing troops to seize cotton on the docks, what people anywherehad faced such acts by their own government without revolting?

The only problem for us was that the South fought too well. It took four years to force them to accept Federal Authority.
Finally, someone else knows history! Yes, while slavery may have been one of the main motivations for the South's secession, it was not the cause of the war. What the war was fought over was the south's other, and perhaps bigger, motivation: too much centralized power in Washington.

Let's not forget that Abraham Lincoln never had any intention to free any slaves until it became an advantageous political platform to adopt. In fact, Abraham Lincoln was not all he was cracked up to be at all. I maintain he was one of our worst presidents, and I've spoken about it at length on my Facebook page.

I didn't see it, but Vampire Hunter is probably closer to the truth than that other piece of film propaganda, Lincoln.


Quote:
Originally Posted by a silly noob View Post
YOURS VERY SLOW ! PLS NEW PROGRESSS PLS NEW UPDATES PLS DARK FORCES FİNAL VERSİON İ CAN WAİTİNG KOTF PART 1 RELEASED 5 YEAR AND İTS 1 MAN ( OSMAN GUNYAZ DEVELOPERS ) BUT YOURS VERY PEOPLE İ CANT WAİTİNG 5 YEARS
Zerimar Nyliram is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-17-2013, 02:08 AM   #4
purifier
Forumite
 
purifier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DisneyLand
Posts: 722
LF Jester 
Quote:
Originally Posted by machievelli View Post
This is only the second movie I have lambasted, but give me a break! The entire use of slavery in the South just because Vampires run the South? Give me an effing Break!

The War Between the States (What most of you remember from American History as the Civil War) was fought not over slavery, it was because the Northern merchants that dealt with finished cloth did not want to have competitors in the south who would also be making it. They wanted a subservient South delivering the cotton necessary to their business. When the South first tried to buy such machinery, the North blocked it's importation. At the same time they attacked the South on two fronts; first by banning further importation of slaves (A hot button Liberal issue) and then placing punitive tariffs for any sale of cotton to any port not in the North.

The North did everything to start that war but fire the first shot! Blockading Southern Ports, landing troops to seize cotton on the docks, what people anywherehad faced such acts by their own government without revolting?

The only problem for us was that the South fought too well. It took four years to force them to accept Federal Authority.
You thinking some less educated minds will believe all that crap, even though it's only a movie with false alternative historical ideas? Or does it irritate you that they made Lincoln look like some kind of 1800's gothic superhero?


Just honest questions. Not really interested in a debate, just want to know why the movie bothers you so much.


SITH HAPPENS
purifier is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-18-2013, 12:48 AM   #5
Darth Avlectus
If Sunday you're free...
 
Darth Avlectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Why don't you come with me...
Posts: 4,267
Current Game: Poisoning pigeons in the park.
Quote:
Originally Posted by purifier View Post
Just honest questions. Not really interested in a debate, just want to know why the movie bothers you so much.
Because it's a bunch of melodramatic doo-doo, the script was written on icky bum wipes, and it are go bad if not treated with air freshener!!!


We'll murder them all, amid laughter and merriment...except for the few we take home to experiment!

"I cant see S***! --YOU GO TO HELL!" --Tourettes guy
Darth Avlectus is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-18-2013, 04:01 AM   #6
purifier
Forumite
 
purifier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DisneyLand
Posts: 722
LF Jester 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Avlectus View Post
Because it's a bunch of melodramatic doo-doo, the script was written on icky bum wipes, and it are go bad if not treated with air freshener!!!

Oh I see, because it just simply sucked! So you're giving it two thumbs down, right?


SITH HAPPENS
purifier is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-19-2013, 11:19 AM   #7
mimartin
TOR ate my KotOR
 
mimartin's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,053
Current Game: TOR/FO:NV
Imperialist Meatbags Guild Officer The Walking Carpets Guild Officer Alderaan News Holopics contributor 
Quote:
Originally Posted by purifier View Post
because it just simply sucked!
Of course it sucked, it was about vampires

It was a fictional movie, it in no way represented itself as a documentary or factional. I have no more problem with it than I do any Star Wars, both are completely fictional. Only problem with "Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter" was it was a terrible writing, terrible direction, terrible acting and terrible concept.


mimartin is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-19-2013, 12:46 PM   #8
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by machievelli View Post
This is only the second movie I have lambasted, but give me a break! The entire use of slavery in the South just because Vampires run the South? Give me an effing Break!

The War Between the States (What most of you remember from American History as the Civil War) was fought not over slavery, it was because the Northern merchants that dealt with finished cloth did not want to have competitors in the south who would also be making it. They wanted a subservient South delivering the cotton necessary to their business. When the South first tried to buy such machinery, the North blocked it's importation. At the same time they attacked the South on two fronts; first by banning further importation of slaves (A hot button Liberal issue) and then placing punitive tariffs for any sale of cotton to any port not in the North.

The North did everything to start that war but fire the first shot! Blockading Southern Ports, landing troops to seize cotton on the docks, what people anywherehad faced such acts by their own government without revolting?

The only problem for us was that the South fought too well. It took four years to force them to accept Federal Authority.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Ca...he_Confederacy


"They should rename the team to the Washington Government Sucks. Put Obama on the helmet. Line the entire walls of the stadium with the actual text of the ACA.
Fix their home team score on the board to the debt clock, they can win every game 17,000,000,000,000 to 24. Losing team gets taxed by the IRS 100%, then droned."
-Toker
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-19-2013, 01:51 PM   #9
CommanderQ
I should go.
 
CommanderQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,630
Current Game: Mass Effect
Forum Veteran Roleplayer Contest winner - Fan Fiction 
Quote:
Originally Posted by machievelli View Post
The only problem for us was that the South fought too well. It took four years to force them to accept Federal Authority.
Well, I'm not really sure how splintered guerilla warfare and 2 failed invasions of the North constitute as fighting well...it really just makes them very...very stubborn. Yes, Lee fully earned the nickname "Wily Gray Fox" and certainly defeated several incompetent Federal generals time and again (alongside the likes of legends like the late Jackson, JEB Stuart, early-war Ewell, pre-Gettysburg Picket, the adopted Texan, John Bell Hood, and the founder of the Klan himself, Forrest), but in all honesty, those were pointless victories. For all the 'glory' and 'honor' of their southern culture these generals fought to defend, they were truly on the wrong side of progress. When it came to appearances, their military victories looked fantastic, but in reality, did little to curb the actual beast that was attacking them. The Federal forces, on the other hand? They understood how to cure the South of a need for war. I mean, for goodness sake, the Civil War was the birth of modern warfare, where Sherman burned and pillaged everything from Tennessee to Georgia, where Grant's numbers forced the Confederate line at Vicksburg to stretch itself so thin they could only place 1 man for every 6 meters in the trenches...the arrogance inherent in Southern strategy was the only thing that prevented a total capitulation. Furthermore, the blame is not on either the North or the South for the beginning of the war, rather, it is both. I mean, conflict between the two had always existed, going as far back as pre-revolution (It even decided the positioning of the US capital). The War for Southern Independence was really just...well, the Yellowstone Fire of 1988. You build up enough tinder without allowing the natural change to take place and a single spark sends everything straight to hell.


you very much
If a tree would fall in the woods.....would the other trees laugh at it?
CommanderQ is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-19-2013, 06:43 PM   #10
Jae Onasi
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem
 
Jae Onasi's Avatar
 
Status: Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,916
Current Game: Guild Wars 2, VtMB, TOR
Alderaan News Holopics contributor Helpful! LucasCast staff Veteran Fan Fic Author 
The battle was going on in Congress and the court system long before war broke out, and was very much a states' rights vs. federal rights issue. Slavery was actually on a decline prior to the start of the Civil War, although slavery had a definitive part as one of the causes.

I think the historical discussion is far more interesting than the movie in this thread.


From MST3K's spoof of "Hercules Unchained"--heard as Roman medic soldiers carry off an unconscious Greek Hercules on a 1950's Army green canvas stretcher: "Hi, we're IX-I-I. Did somebody dial IX-I-I?"

Read The Adventures of Jolee Bindo and see the amazing Peep Surgery
Story WIP: The Dragonfighters
My blog: Confessions of a Geeky Mom--Latest post: Security Alerts!
Love Star Trek AND gaming? Check out Lotus Fleet.

Jae Onasi is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 08-20-2013, 02:08 AM   #11
purifier
Forumite
 
purifier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DisneyLand
Posts: 722
LF Jester 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin View Post
Of course it sucked, it was about vampires
*ahem!* Good one!


Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin View Post
It was a fictional movie, it in no way represented itself as a documentary or factional. I have no more problem with it than I do any Star Wars, both are completely fictional. Only problem with "Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter" was it was a terrible writing, terrible direction, terrible acting and terrible concept.
The thing that gets me though, is that it has a worldwide gross of over $116,000,000.00 so far. Of course that doesn't compare to the worldwide billions of dollars movies like Star Wars bring in, but still, I didn't think it would bring in that much.

I guess it was because it was horror movie and a lot of people love horror movies no matter how cheesy they are.


SITH HAPPENS
purifier is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-15-2013, 09:44 PM   #12
machievelli
Local curmudgeon
 
machievelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 2,834
Current Game: Dungeonseige series
Hot Topic Starter Veteran Fan Fic Author Helpful! Forum Veteran 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerimar Nyliram View Post
Finally, someone else knows history! Yes, while slavery may have been one of the main motivations for the South's secession, it was not the cause of the war. What the war was fought over was the south's other, and perhaps bigger, motivation: too much centralized power in Washington.

Let's not forget that Abraham Lincoln never had any intention to free any slaves until it became an advantageous political platform to adopt. In fact, Abraham Lincoln was not all he was cracked up to be at all. I maintain he was one of our worst presidents, and I've spoken about it at length on my Facebook page.

I didn't see it, but Vampire Hunter is probably closer to the truth than that other piece of film propaganda, Lincoln.
Finally, some recognition! I have studied mainly military history for almost 50 years, and to understand why a nation goes to war, you have to understand what drove them to it.

Anyone who has read the preamble of the Constitution knows the line 'but when a long train of abuses, and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evincing by design to reduce them to absolute despotism, it is their right, and it is their duty, to throw off such government, and provide new guards for their future security'

Quote:
Originally Posted by purifier View Post
You thinking some less educated minds will believe all that crap, even though it's only a movie with false alternative historical ideas? Or does it irritate you that they made Lincoln look like some kind of 1800's gothic superhero?


Just honest questions. Not really interested in a debate, just want to know why the movie bothers you so much.
As Minmartin said, it was poorly written, badly acted, and as a writer who has tried to sell in Hollywood longer than most of you have been alive, it is an insult.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mimartin View Post
Of course it sucked, it was about vampires

It was a fictional movie, it in no way represented itself as a documentary or factional. I have no more problem with it than I do any Star Wars, both are completely fictional. Only problem with "Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter" was it was a terrible writing, terrible direction, terrible acting and terrible concept.
Amen!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommanderQ View Post
Well, I'm not really sure how splintered guerilla warfare and 2 failed invasions of the North constitute as fighting well...it really just makes them very...very stubborn. Yes, Lee fully earned the nickname "Wily Gray Fox" and certainly defeated several incompetent Federal generals time and again (alongside the likes of legends like the late Jackson, JEB Stuart, early-war Ewell, pre-Gettysburg Picket, the adopted Texan, John Bell Hood, and the founder of the Klan himself, Forrest), but in all honesty, those were pointless victories. For all the 'glory' and 'honor' of their southern culture these generals fought to defend, they were truly on the wrong side of progress. When it came to appearances, their military victories looked fantastic, but in reality, did little to curb the actual beast that was attacking them. The Federal forces, on the other hand? They understood how to cure the South of a need for war. I mean, for goodness sake, the Civil War was the birth of modern warfare, where Sherman burned and pillaged everything from Tennessee to Georgia, where Grant's numbers forced the Confederate line at Vicksburg to stretch itself so thin they could only place 1 man for every 6 meters in the trenches...the arrogance inherent in Southern strategy was the only thing that prevented a total capitulation. Furthermore, the blame is not on either the North or the South for the beginning of the war, rather, it is both. I mean, conflict between the two had always existed, going as far back as pre-revolution (It even decided the positioning of the US capital). The War for Southern Independence was really just...well, the Yellowstone Fire of 1988. You build up enough tinder without allowing the natural change to take place and a single spark sends everything straight to hell.
Look at the fact that almost every factory making weapons, from pistols to cannon, were located in the North. If most of the citizens that went to fight for the south had not brought their own rifles, they would have been sending men in Russian or Chinese human wave attacks. There is no way the less than 1% who owned slaves could convince the rest to fight.
I knew someone would bring this up. The entire argument is 'only after the war did they state their grievances', which is crap. As Raphael Semmes pointed out in his book of the voyages of the Sumter and the Alabama, Southern Americans back to Patrick Henry knew that a Federal government would automatically favor the more populous North. I defy anyone to show me the passage that states this is an inviolate contract between the Federal government and the states.

As George Pickett in the Movie Gettysburg pointed out, the original Articles of Confederation (The predecessor to the Constitution) was more of a gentleman's club, or an alliance of neighboring nations. It wasn't until the time of Daniel Webster and Supreme Court justice Joseph Story, that suddenly the government decided you were a member until you died.

The North forced that war because they didn't have a de jure leg to stand on. Afterward, they treated the South just like any conqueror would, demanding reparations and punitive back taxes to cripple the southern economy. Without the slaves the South would have to take all those under-employed whites and put them to work choppin' cotton for their Union Massas.


'To argue with those who have renounced the use and authority of reason is as futile as to administer medicine to the dead.' Now who said that?

From the one who brought you;
What we die for...
Acceptance
KOTOR excerpts
Star Wars: The Beginning
Star Wars: Republic Dawn
Return From Exile

Last edited by machievelli; 10-15-2013 at 09:50 PM.
machievelli is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Knights of the Old Republic > Community > Kavar's Corner > Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 PM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.