lfnetwork.com mark read register faq members calendar

Thread: Intel Nvidia Buyout? Good or Bad ?
Thread Tools Display Modes
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Old 10-15-2006, 06:02 AM   #1
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
Intel Nvidia Buyout? Good or Bad ?

Since AMD and ATI jumped into bed together, rumours of a similar move by Intel towards nVidia have run rampant. Though totally unconfirmed in any official way by either party, the buzz is strong enough that to have influenced nvidia's stock prices. Clicky for more detail on that.

Stock prices etc aside, is this actually a good thing ?? It could be good from a competition point of view, but would have its downsides too.

Having a diversity when choosing system components was good(though can result in headaches too) On the other hand, the potential for graphics hardware to achieve optimum performance standards also increases...

what do others think ?? I'll use this thread to keep tabs on this story...though at this stage it is definitely still a "strongish" rumour

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-15-2006, 01:59 PM   #2
Mav
8-Bit Code Monkey
 
Mav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: A House
Posts: 4,043
Current Game: SWTOR
meh, personally I wont take much interest in Intel and nVidia, but that is just because I'm a AMD/ATI fanboy, I was before they merged and am still.


"Women are like sunsets… they’re beautiful, but there will be a different one tomorrow." - Gilder
Mav is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-15-2006, 05:52 PM   #3
Negative Sun
Death to all but metal!
 
Negative Sun's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tropical Scotland
Posts: 2,683
Current Game: NWN
Forum Veteran Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
I agree with maverick, if I have to choose, I'd go for AMD/ATI, just because I've used them as far as I can remember, only recently I had to switch to an NVidia GPU and it's kinda doing my head in lol



"I killed a man cause he killed my goat."
Negative Sun is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-15-2006, 10:56 PM   #4
Det. Bart Lasiter
obama.png
 
Det. Bart Lasiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: `(•.°)~
Posts: 7,997
Current Game: all
Forum Veteran LF Jester 
If Intel keeps up the level of performance that their Core 2 Duos have, I'll definitely go with Intel/nVidia just so I won't have to deal with the ATi drivers.



"No, Mama. You can bet your sweet ass and half a titty whoever put that hit on you already got the cops in their back pocket." ~Black Dynamite
Det. Bart Lasiter is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-16-2006, 12:15 AM   #5
stingerhs
Follow the Wolves
 
stingerhs's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: between my ears
Posts: 4,641
Current Game: Dead Space
Forum Veteran Roleplayer LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
meh, who cares as long as it benefits the rest of us??


See the struggle of the faithless lot as they negate their time
How low to sink to the depths of their frame of mind

stingerhs is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-16-2006, 09:49 AM   #6
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
My first post in the new tech forum-great idea, Astro!

I touched on this in the discussion in Ahto. While I think this merger would have some advantages such as better, more efficient and cooler-running Nvidia GPUs (ultimately 45nm, same goes for the AMD/ATI merger), it will slash the current selection of four CPU/GPU combinations to just two, namely AMD/ATI and Intel/Nvidia.

I've already read that future ATI products will probably no longer support Intel CPUs, and if an Intel/Nvidia merger occurs I can only see them going the same route in retaliation. If this is true, it's really going to suck.
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-16-2006, 10:45 AM   #7
Astrotoy7
A Face from The Past
 
Astrotoy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,284
Notable contributor Helpful! Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qliveur
My first post in the new tech forum-great idea, Astro!
welcome Qliveur, glad to see you here

re- Another thing not to forget about is IBM/Sony/Toshiba's Cell Processor

The numbers on it are definitely impressive. Once they moved beyond its use in the PS3, I wonder if they will see it through to the PC. I think it would be good to have a third player on the market

Some more interesting new starting to float out of AMD/ATI is that they are working on combined CPU and GPU (CnGPU) That would be nice indeed...no need for a separate graphics card....but will it be able to yield as high performance...???

definitely alot of change in the wind in the compy tech world in the next 12-24 months Im happy with my system for the moment....for the new stuff Im taking the 'wait-n-see' approach

mtfbwya


Asinus asinum fricat
Astrotoy7 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-16-2006, 11:47 AM   #8
Negative Sun
Death to all but metal!
 
Negative Sun's Avatar
 
Status: Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tropical Scotland
Posts: 2,683
Current Game: NWN
Forum Veteran Folder extraordinaire LFN Staff Member Helpful! 
I would think that a combined GPU and CPU would give better performance, otherwise what's the point? A faster transfer in data between the GPU and CPU and a better compabtability can only be a plus in my book...



"I killed a man cause he killed my goat."
Negative Sun is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-16-2006, 09:19 PM   #9
CalcProgrammer1
Rookie
 
CalcProgrammer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 91
Yah I agree, that's the reason that people went to PCI express, cause data transfer is faster, but it would be great if CPU and GPU had that fast of data transfer rate. And to think I'm using AGP and upgrading it... Ah well, anything's gotta be better than my nVidia geForce4 MX (which runs on an AMD chip), so I'm gonna get an ATi X1600 Pro
CalcProgrammer1 is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-16-2006, 11:30 PM   #10
Q
The one who knocks
 
Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ABQ
Posts: 6,643
Current Game: Mowing down neos with my M60
LF Jester Forum Veteran Helpful! 
A combined CPU/GPU? Sharing the same memory (DDR4, perhaps?) over the HT bus (or Intel's equivalent ), it couldn't help but be more efficient and maybe even less expensive (probably not, but no more so at least). These mergers might not suck so bad after all...
Q is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Old 10-17-2006, 12:45 PM   #11
Alegis
In hiding
 
Alegis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,880
LFN Staff Member 
Was Intel/ATI. Though if they really share CPU and GPU going with intel then.

If a combined CPU/GPU achieves MASSIVE FIREPOWER then we're all happy methinks.


-"The glass is neither half-full nor half-empty: it's twice as big as it needs to be."
Alegis is offline   you may: quote & reply,
Post a new thread. Add a reply to this thread. Indicate all threads in this forum as read. Subscribe to this forum. RSS feed: this forum RSS feed: all forums
Go Back   LucasForums > Network > Community Discussion > General LFNetwork Forums > General Tech Discussion > Intel Nvidia Buyout? Good or Bad ?

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 PM.

LFNetwork, LLC ©2002-2011 - All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.