Is the terrain changing enough?

Pwnzor326 · 09-29-2008, 05:06 PM

I've heard alot of talk about this game being an overly praised tech demo. That it couldn't sustain a whole game. Do you guys think that this game will be good? I played the demo which I liked alot but I don't think I would spend $60 on it (same goes for Force Unleashed).

GeneralPloKoon · 09-29-2008, 06:28 PM

I do think it should be cheaper. I'll wait for it to come out and see what people say.

***Thrik*** · 09-30-2008, 05:29 AM

I think the key factor is whether or not the other elements of the game can hold their own.

**RoxStar** · 09-30-2008, 07:45 PM

Yeah. The whole premise is still sort of a Gears of War-eseque third person shooter. The terrain changing element is a big feature and will hopefully complement the game's underlying elements.

Da_man · 10-01-2008, 01:10 AM

I'd buy because I want to see how the terrain-changing thing works out in multiplayer. Using the terrain deformation would completely upturn the standard way most shooters are played.

Ctrl Alt Del · 10-02-2008, 02:37 PM

Terrain deformation capabilities is the "revolutionary" aspect every game nowadays seems to claim for itself. That said, while the idea may be good without a decent level design, a good AI and, damn, fun gameplay, what's it besides a wasted good idea?

PastramiX · 10-02-2008, 07:29 PM

They should've used the terraforming aspect in one of those fun physics games, rather than an all too common shooter. It seems that for a game to be revolutionary or new these days, it has to be a shooter. I say no.